Patient 360 & Care Coordination¶
Unified patient profiles with care gap identification, readmission risk prediction, and care team coordination.
Priority: P0 — Immediate ROI
Time to Value: 4-6 weeks
Category: Clinical & Care Management
Business Problem¶
Patient data is fragmented across EHR (clinical), revenue cycle (financial), imaging systems (diagnostics), and clinical notes (unstructured). Clinicians and care coordinators lack a complete picture:
- Fragmented records — a patient's history spans multiple EHR instances (primary care, specialists, hospitals), each with partial information
- Care gaps invisible — overdue screenings, immunizations, and chronic disease management milestones are buried in individual records, not surfaced proactively
- Readmission surprises — patients discharged without adequate follow-up return to the ED within 30 days; readmission penalties cost hospitals millions annually
- Care coordination breakdown — transitions between primary care, specialists, and post-acute settings lose information, leading to duplicated tests and contradictory treatments
- Social determinant blindness — food insecurity, transportation barriers, and housing instability significantly impact health outcomes but are rarely captured or acted upon
Capabilities¶
Unified Patient Profile¶
Single longitudinal view combining EHR clinical data (diagnoses, medications, labs, vitals), revenue cycle (coverage, claims, financial clearance), imaging (results, pending studies), and NLP-extracted data from clinical notes.
Care Gap Identification¶
Automated detection of overdue preventive care (mammograms, colonoscopies, HbA1c tests, immunizations) and chronic disease management gaps based on evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Readmission Risk Prediction¶
ML model predicting 30-day readmission probability at discharge based on clinical acuity, comorbidities, prior utilization, medication complexity, social determinants, and post-discharge care plan adequacy.
Care Team Coordination Hub¶
Unified view of all providers involved in a patient's care (PCP, specialists, care coordinators, social workers) with shared task lists, transition alerts, and care plan tracking.
Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) Integration¶
Incorporate SDoH screening data (Z-codes), community resource availability, and area-level deprivation indices into the patient profile to identify non-clinical barriers to health.
Data Sources & Ontology Mapping¶
flowchart LR
subgraph Data Plane
EHR["EHR / EMR"]
RCM["Revenue Cycle"]
IMAGING["Imaging & Lab"]
NOTES["Clinical Notes"]
POP["Population Data"]
end
subgraph Ontology Entities
PATIENT["Patient / MRN"]
CLINICAL["Clinical History"]
ENCOUNTERS["Encounter Timeline"]
COVERAGE["Insurance & Coverage"]
SDOH["Social Determinants"]
end
subgraph AI Workflow
MATCH["Patient Matching"]
PROFILE["Profile Builder"]
GAPS["Care Gap Detector"]
READMIT["Readmission Predictor"]
end
EHR --> PATIENT
EHR --> CLINICAL
RCM --> COVERAGE
RCM --> ENCOUNTERS
IMAGING --> CLINICAL
NOTES --> CLINICAL
POP --> SDOH
PATIENT --> MATCH
CLINICAL --> PROFILE
ENCOUNTERS --> PROFILE
COVERAGE --> PROFILE
SDOH --> PROFILE
MATCH --> PROFILE
PROFILE --> GAPS
PROFILE --> READMIT
| Ontology Entity | Source System | Key Fields |
|---|---|---|
| Patient / MRN | EHR + RCM | MRN, Name, DOB, Gender, Address, Insurance, PCP, Consent Status |
| Clinical History | EHR + Imaging + Notes | Diagnoses (ICD-10), Medications, Allergies, Lab Results, Vitals, Procedures, Imaging Results |
| Encounter Timeline | EHR + RCM | Encounter Date, Type (inpatient/outpatient/ED), Facility, Provider, Disposition, LOS |
| Insurance & Coverage | Revenue Cycle | Payer, Plan, Coverage Dates, Copay, Deductible, Prior Auth Requirements |
| Social Determinants | EHR (Z-codes) + Population Data | Housing Status, Food Security, Transportation, Employment, Area Deprivation Index |
AI Workflow¶
- Patient Matching — Probabilistic matching across EHR instances and external data sources using MRN, name, DOB, SSN (last 4), address, and phone to build a Master Patient Index
- Profile Assembly — Aggregate clinical history (problems, medications, allergies, labs), encounter timeline, coverage details, SDoH factors, and NLP-extracted findings from clinical notes
- Care Gap Detection — Apply evidence-based guidelines (HEDIS, USPSTF, ADA, AHA) against patient's clinical record to identify overdue screenings, labs, immunizations, and chronic disease milestones
- Readmission Risk Scoring — Gradient-boosted model trained on historical readmissions; features include LACE+ score components, medication count, SDoH flags, discharge disposition, and follow-up appointment status
- Transition of Care Alerts — For patients transitioning between care settings (hospital → SNF → home), generate alerts for the receiving provider with critical information: medication reconciliation, pending results, follow-up needs
- SDoH Action Matching — For patients with identified social barriers, match to available community resources (food banks, transportation services, housing programs) based on location and eligibility
- Output — Patient 360 dashboard in EHR for clinicians; care gap worklists for care coordinators; readmission risk alerts at discharge; transition-of-care notifications for receiving providers
Dashboard & Alerts¶
Key Metrics¶
| KPI | Description | Target |
|---|---|---|
| 30-Day Readmission Rate | % of discharged patients readmitted within 30 days | < 10% (CMS target) |
| Care Gap Closure Rate | % of identified care gaps addressed within 90 days | > 75% |
| Patient Matching Accuracy | % of patient records correctly linked across systems | > 98% |
| Transition of Care Completion | % of transitions with medication reconciliation + follow-up scheduled | > 90% |
| SDoH Screening Rate | % of patients with completed SDoH assessment | > 60% |
| Care Coordinator Caseload Efficiency | Patients managed per coordinator with care gap closure rate maintained | 20% improvement |
Alert Rules¶
| Alert | Trigger | Severity | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| High readmission risk | Patient at discharge with readmission probability > 0.35 | Critical | Trigger enhanced discharge planning; schedule 48-hour follow-up call; assign care coordinator |
| Critical care gap | High-risk patient overdue for HbA1c >6 months (diabetic) or mammogram >18 months | High | Push to care gap worklist; generate patient outreach (portal message, phone call) |
| Transition of care | Patient transferred to SNF/home health without medication reconciliation completed | High | Alert receiving provider; flag incomplete transition |
| SDoH barrier identified | Patient screens positive for food insecurity or transportation barrier | Medium | Route to social worker; match to community resources |
| Duplicate patient detected | Two records with >90% match probability found across systems | Medium | Queue for manual review; prevent duplicate orders/billing |
ROI Model¶
| Metric | Before | After | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30-day readmission rate | 14.5% | 10.2% | 30% reduction → $4.2M avoided CMS penalties + costs |
| Care gap closure | 48% of gaps addressed | 72% of gaps addressed | 50% improvement → better outcomes + quality bonuses |
| Duplicate patient rate | 8% of records | 2% of records | 75% reduction → fewer medical errors |
| Care coordinator productivity | 85 patients per coordinator | 110 patients per coordinator | 29% improvement → $1.2M labor savings |
| Preventable ED visits | 3,200 / year | 2,100 / year | 34% reduction → $3.3M cost avoidance |
Estimated Annual ROI
$8M - $15M annually from readmission reduction, care gap closure, ED avoidance, and coordinator productivity — across a mid-size health system with 25,000+ annual discharges.
Implementation Notes¶
- Patient matching across EHR instances requires a robust EMPI (Enterprise Master Patient Index); expect 90-95% auto-match rates with manual review for ambiguous cases
- Care gap detection requires mapping clinical guidelines to computable rules against EHR-structured data (diagnoses, procedures, labs)
- Readmission model needs minimum 24 months of discharge-to-readmission data with clinical features at time of discharge
- SDoH integration depends on screening tool adoption (PRAPARE, AHC-HRSN); area-level data (ADI, SVI) can supplement individual screening
- HIPAA compliance must be maintained throughout; all data access must follow minimum necessary standard and role-based access controls